Along with seismic data (which numerous universities and NGOs will have records of, so much harder to corrupt), such seismic is detectable at VERY long ranges in comparison with visual & sound effects?
Who is doing atmospheric analysis for particulates, radioisotopes, pollutants? Might a suspicious plume of tungsten, hafnium or other unco…
Along with seismic data (which numerous universities and NGOs will have records of, so much harder to corrupt), such seismic is detectable at VERY long ranges in comparison with visual & sound effects?
Who is doing atmospheric analysis for particulates, radioisotopes, pollutants? Might a suspicious plume of tungsten, hafnium or other uncommon (and relatively dense) elements have showed up down wind? Once again, any university earth sciences department and several NGOs are likely gathering such data all around Eastern Europe/Western Asia, though possibly not interrogating their collected data for this signal.
Along with seismic data (which numerous universities and NGOs will have records of, so much harder to corrupt), such seismic is detectable at VERY long ranges in comparison with visual & sound effects?
Who is doing atmospheric analysis for particulates, radioisotopes, pollutants? Might a suspicious plume of tungsten, hafnium or other uncommon (and relatively dense) elements have showed up down wind? Once again, any university earth sciences department and several NGOs are likely gathering such data all around Eastern Europe/Western Asia, though possibly not interrogating their collected data for this signal.